Mind you that tolerance; like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. In simple plain easy to understand English. The morons that preach tolerance are the first ones to play that famous hypocrisy card, DO AS I SAY NOT AS I DO.
From an article listed below: “He asked the judge, ‘How am I supposed to live?’ ” Mr. Scott said. “And the judge said something like, ‘That’s your problem. You figure it out.’
None of definitions listed below offer a real or profound example of tolerance. Tolerance against an inanimate objects such as the Confederate Battle Flag or guns that fire themselves. We tolerate career politicians. Do you know that Poly means many and Tics are blood sucking creatures. So, in other words Congress is full of many blood sucking creatures. Time for a change in term limit tolerances.
Is five mile per hour over the posted speed limit tolerable? Or the moron that is doing five mph under the limit in the passing/fast lane tolerable? Depends on where you live; In CA, the CHP will force the slower people over, on the beltway in MD, you will get passed doing 90.
The question I pose is; is it all right to break any laws? Whether the letter or the spirit of the law? Personally, I think all laws were meant to broken. We had to break the law of physics to get the H-bomb, splitting atoms is unnatural. Edison had his many doubters about the light bulb. There are many funky laws still on the books in some states, such as: AZ if you find you spouse cheating you can shoot him/her; however, you have to shoot them both. Open carry guns laws in some states. The states with the strictest gun laws have the highest homicide rate (Chicago).
Why do we tolerate things that should be changed and try then do absolutely nothing about the shit that shouldn’t be even considered?
I have tolerated a lot of shit, from being homeless and starving to wanting to commit suicide because I couldn’t face another day of trying to pay for little ungrateful bitches that refuse to grow up and a bastard that I never want to see. Does this make me a bad person? First off, I really don’t give a good god-dam what you think. Don’t try and impose your ethical and moral values on me, until (unless) you have walked a mile or two in my shoes. Then maybe we can talk on another level.
What I really want you to examine your own ideas of tolerance. Do you justify every action with; because that is just the way it is? That makes you part of the masses or sheeple. Can’t or wont think outside the box. Do dads deserve to live like 3rd class citizens, just to pacify a system that is corrupted by gender bias?
When most of the ‘laws’ were established the father was the primary bread winner. So, of course he wasn’t home to fulfill the neat little term that gets every guy, (when it comes to child support) (PRIMARY CAREGIVER). How in the fuck is that supposed to be equal? The balance of power has shifted slightly in the last 50 years towards dads. Though it is still beyond any real tolerance.